Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Feds probe equipment failure at Calif. nuke plant

 By MICHAEL R. BLOOD, Associated Press–4 days ago

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A nuclear reactor on the California coast will remain shut down indefinitely while a team of federal inspectors determines why several relatively new tubes became so frail that tests found they could rupture and release radioactive water, a federal official said Thursday.

"This is a significant issue," said Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokeswoman Lara Uselding. "A tube rupture is really the concern. ... That's what we don't want to happen."

Underscoring concern over the test findings, the NRC dispatched a special team to the Unit 3 reactor at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, located about 45 miles north of San Diego. The plant was shut down as a precaution on Jan. 31, after a radioactive water leak in another tube in a massive steam generator. Traces of radiation escaped, but officials say there was no danger to workers or neighbors.

The NRC said Thursday that pressure tests showed three of the metal-alloy generator tubes had become so degraded that they could rupture under some circumstances. Such ruptures can require a plant to shut down, if spewing water reaches 150 gallons a day.

Investigators have been looking into what federal officials call excessive wear found on steam generator tubes in the seaside plant and its twin, Unit 2, which has been off line for maintenance and refueling. In a $670 million overhaul, two huge steam generators, each containing 9,700 tubes, were replaced in Unit 2 in fall 2009 and a year later in Unit 3. Read more…

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Occupy, social justice groups blockade entrance to Monsanto

 
“We are calling for a ‘global class-action’ against Monsanto,” said Steven Payan, one of the Davis protest organizers. “We are joining the world in solidarity to demand a ban on all GMO foods and hold Monsanto accountable for its actions throughout history from Agent Orange to Deforestation to current and past deaths to preying on small farmers through a broken court system and also through International Free Trade Agreements.”


Occupy, social justice groups blockade entrance to Monsanto
by Dan Bacher
As of 8:01 a.m, more than 100 occupiers from throughout the state have blocked the entrances to Monsanto’s Davis facility on 1910 5th St. 
They reported they have shut down the corporate giant, which produces genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and is notorious for its inordinate influence over the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Obama administration. Police are now on the scene.
You can see the protest live at sacmedia.tv.
The protest is part of a “Global Days of Action to Shut Down Monsanto” in dozens of U.S. cities and several countries. Occupy groups from Sacramento, Davis, Woodland and even Los Angeles are expected to participate, as well as labor, environmental, veterans and social justice groups.
“We are calling for a ‘global class-action’ against Monsanto,” said Steven Payan, one of the Davis protest organizers. “We are joining the world in solidarity to demand a ban on all GMO foods and hold Monsanto accountable for its actions throughout history from Agent Orange to Deforestation to current and past deaths to preying on small farmers through a broken court system and also through International Free Trade Agreements.” http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2012/03/16/18709435.php

Wednesday, March 14, 2012



Discovery News > Earth News > Two-headed Trout Raises Eyebrows in Idaho

Two-headed Trout Raises Eyebrows in Idaho

 Analysis by Sarah Simpson
Wed Feb 29, 2012 06:47 AM ET

If you want to furrow a few eyebrows, tell your friends about the two-headed baby trout born of wild fish caught in a polluted Idaho stream (above). If you want to get them really riled up, explain that a major mining company linked this disturbing mutation to selenium pollution from one of its own mines -- and still had the audacity to assert that those selenium levels are safe.

The questionable integrity of this company's scientific research, which Leslie Kaufman detailed last week in The New York Times, has fueled a much broader debate over what levels of selenium pollution should be allowed in U.S. watersheds. Federal agencies, environmental groups and one of the nation’s largest private companies are at odds, and Kaufman’s portrayal of the details is both intriguing and disturbing.

“In my research, I have seen lots of malformed baby fish, but never one with two heads,” David Janz, an aquatic toxicology professor at the University of Saskatchewan, told Kaufman. “Selenium is emerging as a pollutant of global concern,” he said. “We need to be careful here.” Read more

Thursday, March 8, 2012


MWD

Get the Facts MWD Posted: Thursday, March 8, 2012 9:42 am


Water Authority Launches “MWD Facts: The Truth About the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

The San Diego County Water Authority today launched a new website – www.MWDFacts.com -- to provide greater information and transparency into the powerful and secretive Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Water Authority is a member agency of MWD, which serves more than half of California’s population in a service area with an economy with a gross domestic product of greater than $1 trillion.

Yet despite its size and impact on Southern California ratepayers and the California economy, “MWD has too often kept critical information clouded in secrecy, misdirection and obfuscation” said Dennis Cushman, assistant general manager of the Water Authority. Read more

BUDGET DEFICITS, BOND DEBT, BILLIONAIRES, THE BROWN FAMILY AND BIG PROFITS

BUDGET DEFICITS, BOND DEBT, BILLIONAIRES, THE BROWN FAMILY AND BIG PROFITS
By Patrick Porgans and Lloyd G. Carter

Part One
Editor’s note: This is a two-part series. Part One focuses on how the wealthy and landed have used the public bond process in California to further their own interests, while promoting and profiting from the state’s “budget crisis”. Part Two focuses on the family legacy of Gov. Edmund G. “Pat” Brown, who first mastered the art of selling water bonds half a century ago, to finance the construction of the State Water Project, which was sold as a project that would pay for itself and unify the state. It never has, and it is at the crux of Bay-Delta conflict and state’s “water crisis.”

California’s 90 billionaires (according to Forbes Magazine) and 662,735 millionaires got rich in a lot of different ways. But, there are those billionaires that thirst for more, apparently, the Golden State’s record-breaking $2 trillion in gross annual production (GDP), in 2010, which makes the state the Eighth most productive economy in the world wasn’t quite enough. But let’s not forget California’s GDP is said to represent 13 percent of the USA’s GDP.

California’s land rich billionaires – whose wealth, ultimately, depends on water - have had a significant role in using the “system” (tax-base revenue, credit rating, and natural resources) to promote and support issuances of tens of billions of dollars of General Obligation (GO) bonds to fund vested interest public works projects, particularly water and water-related grant programs which considerably enhance the value of their land. And the grant money, often used to build local water district infrastructure and help fund developers, is free. At the same time, the billionaires have the public pay to increase their water supply reliability, and are selling this water back to the public at astronomically high prices.

A government grant-funded study, conducted at the Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, indicates that from 1987 through 2008, and estimated $3.9 billion in water water-transfer sales/profits were made by some of the state’s richest billionaires. As the saying goes, in California water runs uphill and toward money.

These GO bonds fund a myriad of state programs and finance massive public works projects that directly aid the landed gentry. These include billionaires like Orange County real estate king Donald Bren, who reportedly owns 110,000 acres, and has a “Master Plan” to develop significant portions of land (http://www.goodplanning.org/Master-Plan/default.aspx).

Bren, reportedly, is a close friend of former Gov. Pete Wilson, an employee of Bren’s before and after serving as governor.There is also Beverly Hills resident Stewart Resnick (now the biggest “farmer” in California with 200,000 acres in Kern and Kings counties) and there are the heirs of cotton king J.G. Boswell.The Boswell family owns 200,000 acres of farmland in the Tulare Basin and want to build a city of 30,000 on land they own in the Tulare County foothills. They profit directly when California’s voters fund multi-billion bond projects to export Northern California water south to industrial farm fields in the western San Joaquin Valley or to the never-ending desert subdivisions in the Southland. Furthermore, the majority of them are also involved in profiting from water sales and marketing.

Tejon Ranch, now owned by Cattelus (another billionaire outfit which morphed from the railroads), owns 270,000 acres straddling the “Grapevine” Interstate 5 route over the Tehachapis. It is the largest block of private land in California. The combined acreage for just these four companies (Bren, Resnick, Boswell, Catellus) exceeds 780,000 acres.And all four of these Big Money players already are engaged in filling their unquenchable thirst for a more “reliable” source of water from the north, and have received windfall profits from the GO bonds. And, of course, this year, voters will be asked to fund yet another $11 billion water bond measure (which will take $22 billion to pay off) to move yet more water south.

You can count on Team Billionaire - which includes the billionaires, major landholders, chambers of commerce, local water districts (most of which are members of the Association of California Water Agencies), banks, investment firms, and all manner of Southern California real estate and development interests - to spend huge amounts of money to convince voters to approve water-related GO bond measures.

According to the state’s Department of Finance’s (DOF) website, there are currently a total of $150 billion in GO bonds which have been approved by the voters in the past few decades, of which a total of $79.6 billion has been issued and is being repaid from the General Fund.

To put the $79.6 billion debt in perspective, in Governor Jerry Brown’s recently approved 2011-2012 state budget totaled $129 billion, Approximately $86 billion came from General Fund revenues, the remaining amount come from special funds and other bonds. The principal and interest payment on the outstanding G.O. bond debt is in excess of $136 billion; includes fixed and variable rate estimates on bonds.

Of the $79.6 billion of GO bond debt (principal), an estimated $19.4 billion was authorized primarily for water programs, including buying water for fish; mitigation, wildlife conservation easements, studies, drought relief, local irrigation, flood protection, and municipal water district infrastructure projects. Add at least another $13 billion in interest to pay off the $19.4 billion in water bonds and you have a total water-related public debt of at least $32.4 billion; comparatively speaking, it represents about 40 percent of the cost to run the state General Fund programs.

State Treasurer Bill Lockyer says payment of the interest and principal on all GO bonds is a crushing $10 billion a yearamounting to nearly a tenth of the state’s General Fund – and is expected to keep rising each year. This addiction to bonds is a principal reason for the draconian state budget cuts in education, police and fire services, and programs for the elderly and disabled that occurred in recent years. Indeed, to meet those bond obligations, California has cut $115.7 billion from the state budget in the last three fiscal years.

During the governorship of Arnold Schwarzenegger, the state’s bond debt doubled as the “no more taxes” crowd simply turned to bonds to get the public to foot the bill for water projects, programs and other infrastructure financing to sustain and expand their publicly subsidized business ventures, most for agribusiness, new Southern California subdivisions on the desert, and increased reliable supplies for them to have more water to sell back to the public.

What the billionaires know, of course, is that GO bonds are still being used to pay off the $1.75 billion State Water Project (SWP) which former Governor Edmund G. “Pat” Brown sold to the public back in 1960 as a project that would “pay for itself.”It has never come close to paying for itself and it could take an additional $63 billion, according to the California Department of Water Resources, to make real the water which Brown, Sr. purportedly promised a half century ago. In fact, SWP contractors, many of who supported the original GO bond debt, have vehemently refused to take responsibility for bearing the burden of the $32.4 billion in water-related debt; as SWP beneficiaries, by law, they are required to pay certain costs. Instead, they have passed it on to the unsuspecting public with the help of their campaign-supported (s)elected officials.

In addition, water bonds promoted under the fear tactic of “safe, clean, reliable” water have been issued for water projects that directly benefit SWP urban and agribusiness contractors. Such bonds are much easier to sell to unwitting voters than raising taxes first to pay for things society needs, which is always a tough sell for politicians. A bond, it turns out, is a tax but a hidden one. The water-guzzling land billionaires are hoping they can float one more bond by the voters next year. Their success is dependent upon a vote of the people.

Editor’s Note:In Part Two, Porgans and Carter discuss how the water bond phenomena was pioneered by Gov. Edmund G. “Pat” Brown, Sr. and now plays a key role in the lives of his son, current Gov. Jerry Brown, Jerry’s sister, Kathleen Brown and the investment firm Goldman Sachs.

Patrick Porgans and Lloyd G. Carter have both been writing about California water issues for 40 years. Porgans’ email address is pp@planetarysolutionaries.org.Carter’s email is lcarter0i@comcast.net.

Re-Posted by Patrick Porgans

Truth About Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of So. CA

MWD’s Proposed Water Rate Increases for 2013 and 2014
GET THE FACTS
MWD IS HOLDING A HEARING ON MARCH 12 TO HEAR WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT HIGHER WATER RATES.

  §  MWD’s full service rates have increased 75% since 2006.
§  MWD is recommending additional rate increases for 2013 and 2014 that will bring the total rate increases to 101% since 2006.
§  MWD’s rate increases might not be necessary if MWD would cut expenses to better match sales revenue.

IF YOU DON’T SPEAK UP, YOUR RATES WILL GO UP!

 §  By law, MWD must hold a public hearing before it can raise your water rates.
    §  MWD’s own rules require the board to vote on water rate increases in April so the board can consider public
       comment. MWD is now planning to approve rates in March, one month early, immediately after the public
       hearing. .
§  That means these water rate increases are a “done deal”- unless the public shows up and makes itself heard! Read more: where to speak out against MWD's rate increases.
§  Tell MWD what you think about its proposed water rate increases — and demand that they play by their own rules: Adopt the rates in April, not March!

Where to go to speak out against MWD’s rateincreases:

Information provided by San Diego County Water Authority  mdwfacts.com


Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Water rights questioned

 Heidi Desch
River View The Kootenai River, U.S. Highway 2 and the railroad tracks weave their way through the mountains west of Libby. The view is from the old Highway 2 trail.
Posted: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 1:20 pm | Updated: 1:44 pm, Wed Mar 7, 2012.

Water rights questioned Sandra Faye Douthit - ReporterThe Western News

The state of Montana proposed a resolution for off-reservation water rights claims for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes in Polson on Wednesday, Feb. 29 and Commissioner Tony Berget was there.

The original resolution was proposed July 20, 2011, yet was revised for the presentation to the tribal council by the state before the meeting.

The proposal establishes the rights of level and goals that would provide:

     • Fishery resources in the drainages — providing them with tangible biological benefits;
     • Flow-ramping rates and seasonal minimum discharges from Libby Dam designed to protect the
         bull trout;
     • Protection to the existing water-rights holders,
     • Remaining water from the drainages to be used for future development of new consumptive
         uses.

The resolution would recognize the instream flow rights in the Kootenai and Swan rivers drainages.

However, the current EH is based on data that was gathered from 1929 to 1971 by natural flow conditions, and prior to the installment of the Libby Dam, which was built in 1972.

The effects from the operations of the Libby Dam have caused altered natural flow conditions to the Kootenai River.

The flow from the dam changes the levels of the junior surface and ground irrigators.

Depending how many gallons-per-minute (GPM), junior water rights holders could bring action predicated on an assertion of water waste — to “call” a claim.

The state believes it is reasonable to suspend the ability to call on junior users so long as the Libby Dam remains in place and the Army Corps of Engineers adheres to the requirements of the Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion and the Montana Operations.
The instream flow from the Kootenai River also includes basin and sub-basin restrictions on new uses of water until a comprehensive water rights settlement among the tribes, state and the U.S. is ratified by the Montana legislature. These restrictions are determined by monthly volume maximums for the post-Compact water permits issued by the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC). The permits provide protection covers for the sub-basin for the core bull trout streams.

The volumes of the Kootenai Basin sub-basins, Grave Creek and O’Brien Creek, existing rights are fully exhausted. Subsequently, the DNRC will not issue permits for the two sub-basins and proposes the closure of future permits as part of the Compact. Read more:  http://www.thewesternnews.com/news/article_c6da2ff2-67c9-11e1-b702-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=image&photo=0