Friday, January 8, 2016
Thursday, January 7, 2016
Farmers Try Political Force to Twist Open California’s Taps
Few in
agriculture have shaped the debate over water more than the
several hundred owners of an arid finger of farmland west of Fresno.
By MICHAEL WINES and JENNIFER MEDINADEC. 30, 2015 NYT
For almost five decades, Westlands has brought its farmers a torrent of water from the reservoirs and aqueducts of the federal Central Valley Project, the vast public work that irrigates half of California agriculture. Drought has reduced that torrent to drops, and El Agua is one part of Westlands’ wide-ranging effort to open the spigots again.
several hundred owners of an arid finger of farmland west of Fresno.
By MICHAEL WINES and JENNIFER MEDINADEC. 30, 2015 NYT
FIVE POINTS, Calif. — The message that Maria L. Gutierrez
gave legislators on Capitol Hill was anguished and blunt: California’s historic
drought had not merely left farmland idle. It had destroyed Latino farm
workers’ jobs, shuttered Latino businesses and thrown Latino families on the
street. Yet Congress had turned a deaf ear to their pleas for more water to
revive farming and farm labor.
So Latinos — the nation’s fastest-growing ethnic group,
she noted pointedly — were sending a warning that politicians could not ignore.
“We created an organization that’s called El Agua
Es Asunto de Todos — Water Is Everybody’s Business — so the Latino voice
can be heard,” Ms. Gutierrez, who described herself as an El Agua volunteer,
said in October 2013 at the meeting with lawmakers. “Don’t devastate our
economy. Don’t take our jobs away.”
The group has since blanketed California with demands for
more water on Spanish-language television, on the Internet, even on yard signs.
But for whom it speaks is another matter: El Agua is bankrolled by more than
$1.1 million from the Westlands Water District, the nation’s
largest agricultural irrigation contractor, a state entity created at the
behest of — and largely controlled by — some of California’s wealthiest and
most politically influential farmers.For almost five decades, Westlands has brought its farmers a torrent of water from the reservoirs and aqueducts of the federal Central Valley Project, the vast public work that irrigates half of California agriculture. Drought has reduced that torrent to drops, and El Agua is one part of Westlands’ wide-ranging effort to open the spigots again.
California has more than 81,000 farms, and
farmers claim four-fifths of all the water its citizens consume. But no one in
agriculture has shaped the debate over water more — or swung their elbows wider
— than the few hundred owners of an arid, Rhode Island-size finger of farmland
west of Fresno.
A water utility on paper, Westlands in practice is a
formidable political force, a $100 million-a-year agency with five lobbying
firms under contract in Washington and Sacramento, a staff peppered with former
federal and congressional powers, a separate political action committee
representing farmers and a government-and-public-relations budget that topped
$950,000 last year. It is a financier and leading force for a band of 29
water districts that spent at least another $270,000 on lobbying last year.
Its nine directors and their relatives gave at least $430,000 to federal
candidates and the Republican Party in the last two election cycles, and the
farmers’ political action committee gave more than $315,000 more. Continue
reading the main story Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Why Is California Giving More Water to Golf Courses Than Wildlife?
Environment
September 21, 2015
Golf courses get 25-year water contracts while a wildlife preserve that shelters millions of birds and dozens of protected species get a 1-year contract. Read more… http://www.alternet.org/environment/lawsuit-claims-socal-giving-more-water-golf-courses-wildlife-
Friday, April 17, 2015
California water officials cancel plan to construct emergency drought barriers in North Delta
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE:
Contact
person: For additional information email Patrick Porgans at pp@planetarysolutionaries.org
17 April 2915
17 April 2915
Steamboat
Slough and Sutter Slough have been removed as sites for two of three barriers, which came under
strong public opposition from members of C.A.R.E.S, Delta farmers and others.
Planetary Solutionaries, one of a number of opponents of the emergency
drought barriers anywhere in the Delta, was informed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers that the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has decided not to dam
up Steamboat Slough and Sutter Slough; however, DWR officials plan to go ahead with the one proposed for West False River. The barrier would be essentially a pile of basketball-size rocks across a 750-foot-wide channel that still allows water flow upstream and downstream, depending on the tides. DWR, operator of the State Water Project, is seeking multiple permits from various agencies to accelerate installation. For additional information from DWR officials, contact Nancy Vogel, Public Affairs Director, (916) 651-7512 Nancy.Vogel@water.ca.gov
According to documentation submitted to the Corps, by the Department, the Emergency Drought Barriers project, proposed for Sutter Slough, Steamboat Slough, and False River would result in permanent impacts to waters of the United States. Temporary fill would be installed starting May and removed in November. Critics claimed that there are no funds earmarked to remove the barriers and that they could cause irreparable damage to Delta farmlands, caused by an increase in saltier water. Planetary Solutionaries raised concerns about the need and justification for the barriers, and the impacts that they present to threatened salmonid and pelagic aquatic species already listed under the Endangered Species Act.
According to documentation submitted to the Corps, by the Department, the Emergency Drought Barriers project, proposed for Sutter Slough, Steamboat Slough, and False River would result in permanent impacts to waters of the United States. Temporary fill would be installed starting May and removed in November. Critics claimed that there are no funds earmarked to remove the barriers and that they could cause irreparable damage to Delta farmlands, caused by an increase in saltier water. Planetary Solutionaries raised concerns about the need and justification for the barriers, and the impacts that they present to threatened salmonid and pelagic aquatic species already listed under the Endangered Species Act.
Department officials claim that the overall project purpose is to prevent the intrusion of
saltwater into the Delta. They believe there is a need to reduce the water
supply risk for delta and upstream users.
The Department applied for a permit
from the Corps, which stated that water quality conditions in the Delta are
declining due to the severe drought conditions and have already approached
human health criteria at many locations in the South Delta and as far south as
the State Water Project and Central Valley Project intake pumps that export
millions of acre-feet of water from the Delta. (One acre-foot of water is enough
water to cover on acre of land in one foot of water.)
The Corps is
preparing to issue a new Public Notice apprising interested parties of the
Department’s decision and the site of the new proposed location of the
emergency drought barrier. The process will be subject to federal ESA and Clean
Water Act review. #
Additional
information can be obtained from the Corps Public Information Office (916)
557-5100, refer to Project
SPK-2014-00187, Emergency Drought Barriers, the applicant is the Department of
Water Resources.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (AP) —
Regulators in California, the country's third-largest oil-producing state, have authorized oil companies to inject production fluids and waste into what are now federally protected aquifers more than 2,500 times, risking contamination of underground water supplies that could be used for drinking water or irrigation, state records show.
While the
permits go back decades, an Associated Press analysis found that nearly half of
those injection wells — 46 percent — were approved or began injections in the
last four years under Gov. Jerry Brown, who has pushed state oil and gas
regulators to speed up the permitting process. That happened despite growing
warnings from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency since 2011 that state
regulators were out of compliance with federal laws meant to protect
underground drinking-water stores from oilfield contamination.
In
California, "we need a big course correction. We need to get the system
back in compliance," said Jared Blumenfeld, regional administrator for the
EPA. "Californians expect their water is not being polluted by oil
producers ... This poses that very real danger." http://news.yahoo.com/california-permitted-oilfield-discharge-protected-water-175027791.html;_ylt=A86.J7_.yddU2FoAFioPxQt.
Monday, February 2, 2015
If you, like 3.5
million Californians, voted “yes” on the $7.5 billion water bond last year, you
should start paying attention to how Gov. Jerry Brown is planning to spend the
bond money.
It may not be on
building new dams to store water for future dry years like he assured voters,
farmers and legislators before the election.
The governor
recently divulged how he wants to spend the first $532 million: restoring
streams, rivers and watersheds, water recycling projects, upgrading drinking
water treatment plants, rebates for people buying water-efficient appliances
and, finally, groundwater management and cleanup.
Something seems to
be missing from this list. [Note: Yes, something is missing, who is getting all
the money.] FYI: Read
more…
'If there are wells having a direct impact
on drinking water, we need to shut them down now'. California state regulators allowed oil companies to dispose
of wastewater in clean groundwater supplies for years, according to a new report.
The San Francisco Chronicle, citing a review of state data,
reports that oil companies built more than 170 waste-disposal wells feeding
into bodies of groundwater that could otherwise have been used for drinking or
irrigation during one of the area’s worst droughts in centuries. The wells are
primarily located in the state’s agricultural Central Valley region, which was
particularly devastated by the drought.
“If there are wells having a direct impact on
drinking water, we need to shut them down now,” said Jared Bluemnfeld, regional
administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency. “Safe drinking water is
only going to become more in demand.”
The
Brown administration allowed oil companies to inject toxic wastewater into
underground drinking water aquifers in the Central Valley, the Chron$
reports. The situation is being made worse by the fact that Central Valley
residents and farmers are increasingly pumping water out of the ground for
drinking and agricultural uses because of the drought. The wastewater
injections have been going on for years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
